<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<step>
  <created-at type="datetime">2007-12-04T09:23:02-08:00</created-at>
  <deleted-at type="datetime" nil="true"></deleted-at>
  <id type="integer">6265</id>
  <lesson-id type="integer">3962</lesson-id>
  <lesson-version-id type="integer">5272</lesson-version-id>
  <position type="integer">1</position>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2007-12-04T09:23:02-08:00</updated-at>
  <contents type="array">
    <content type="TextContent">
      <asset-id type="integer" nil="true"></asset-id>
      <created-at type="datetime">2007-12-04T09:23:02-08:00</created-at>
      <deleted-at type="datetime" nil="true"></deleted-at>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The article below (&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070326095610.htm"&gt;Click here for full text at Sciencedaily.com&lt;/a&gt;)
from ScienceDaily (Mar. 26, 2007) summarizes how the brain fends of
distractions but like much scientific research it seems utterly
pointless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How many studies do we need to finally realize that
being tired or 'mentally fatigued' affects our performance in some way?
Here's the article in summary:&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;How the brain fends off distractions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dutch
researcher Harm Veling has demonstrated that our brains fend off
distractions. If we are busy with something we suppress disrupting
external influences. If we are tired, we can no longer do this...In the
event of tiredness, this system no longer seems to work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Veling
asked study subjects to remember words that were strongly associated
with each other. For example, fruit-mango, fruit-peach, animal-giraffe,
animal-sheep. Subsequently all of these words passed by on a screen and
the study subjects had to intend to press a button for a number of
these words (for example, mango). Mango is referred to here as an
&#180;intended&#180; word. Peach is a very similar word and can confuse the study
subject. Therefore Veling termed this a distracting word. Sheep has got
nothing to do with mango and is therefore a neutral word.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The
test revealed that the study subjects remembered distracting words less
well than intended and neutral words. Moreover, people who were better
at excluding these words from their brains performed the task quicker.
Suppressing distraction is therefore useful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who were
mentally fatigued were no longer able to suppress the distraction.
Moreover they scored less well in their task. Suppression is therefore
not automatic and costs energy. A humorous example of the principles
Veling investigated is the Dutch TV quiz programme Rad van Fortuin
(Wheel of Fortune). The candidates of this quiz are brutally distracted
whilst answering the questions and can therefore scarcely answer the
simplest of questions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There you have it. Pointless...now here's
a picture to distract you and hopefully start you wondering about
whether they fell or for that matter would you have the guts to do
something like that? Are they more alive than you?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <id type="integer">14317</id>
      <lesson-id type="integer">3962</lesson-id>
      <position type="integer">1</position>
      <step-id type="integer">6265</step-id>
      <style-id type="integer">1</style-id>
      <updated-at type="datetime">2007-12-04T09:24:41-08:00</updated-at>
    </content>
  </contents>
</step>
