|
Tech companies' distracted workers are told to come to meetings 'topless'
By Jessica Guynn |Los Angeles Times- March 30, 2008
SAN
FRANCISCO - As the birthplace of technology, Silicon Valley may have
more gadgets per capita than any other place on the planet. Yet, even
here, "always on" can be a real turnoff.
Frustrated by
distracted workers so plugged in that they tune out in the middle of
business meetings, a growing number of companies are going "topless,"
as in no laptops allowed. Also banned from some conference rooms:
BlackBerrys, iPhones and other personal devices on which so many have
come to depend.
Meetings have never been popular in Silicon
Valley. Engineers would rather write code than talk about it. Over the
years, companies have come up with innovative ways to keep staff
meetings from sucking up time. Some remove chairs to force everyone to
talk fast on their feet. Others get everyone to drink a glass of water
beforehand.
But as laptops have gotten lighter and smart
phones even smarter, people have discovered a handy diversion, making
more eye contact these days with their screens than each other. The
practice became so pervasive that Todd Wilkens turned to his company
blog to wage his "personal war against CrackBerry."
"In this age of wireless Internet and mobile e-mail devices, having an
effective meeting or working session is becoming more and more
difficult. Laptops, BlackBerrys, Sidekicks, iPhones, and the like keep
people from being fully present," he wrote in November 2007.
"Aside from just being rude, partial attention generally leads to partial results."
His San Francisco design firm, Adaptive Path,
now strongly encourages all staffers to leave their laptops at their
desks. His colleague, Dan Saffer, coined the term "topless," as in
"laptop-less." Also booted are mobile and smart phones, which must be
stowed on a counter or in a box during meetings. It took some
convincing, but soon people began connecting with each other rather
than with their computers, Wilkens said.
"All of our meetings got a lot more productive," he said.
It's not exactly attention deficit. Linda Stone, a software executive who worked for Apple Inc. and Microsoft Corp.,
calls it "continuous partial attention." It stems from an intense
desire to connect and be connected all the time: to be, in her words,
"a live node on the network."
And it seems to have engulfed all aspects of life, including the workplace.
The ever-increasing speed and power of technology allows employees to
effortlessly toggle back and forth between tasks. The wireless
revolution has only accelerated this trend, turning every laptop
computer into a lightning-quick, mobile communications hub. Darting
among multiple screens from an early age, young people in particular
thrive on that connectivity.
"It's increasingly difficult to
get people's undivided attention," said Stanford University professor
Pamela Hinds, who studies the effects of technology on groups. The
culprit: Etiquette has not kept up with technology, said Sue Fox,
author of Business Etiquette for Dummies.
"Social norms say that the person you are conversing with takes
precedence over text messaging, e-mail and cell phone. This rule
applies in business as well," Fox said. "Today, people seem to be more
focused on their fancy gadgets than on other people. Face-to-face
meetings have become a low priority because they're constantly being
interrupted by technology, and many people can't figure out what to do."
Late in 2007, Jeremy Zawodny, who works with outside software developers at Yahoo Inc., attended his first "no laptops" meeting at the Sunnyvale, Calif., Internet company.
"I looked around in amazement that no one had their laptops open," he said.
"I
try not to bring my laptop to meetings because the pull is strong if I
am not interested in something being discussed or if the topic doesn't
directly involve me."
The folks at Dogster Inc.,
the San Francisco company that runs the sites Dogster.com and
Catster.com, decided to cut the cord about a year ago. The decision was
in keeping with its philosophy of creating a collaborative culture,
said company co-founder John Vars.
"Even if people are just
taking notes, they are not giving the natural human signals that they
are listening to the person who is presenting or speaking," he said.
"It builds up resentment. It can become something that inhibits good
teamwork."
Selina Lo doesn't mind if her employees multitask in meetings. After all, the energetic chief executive of Ruckus Wireless, a Sunnyvale-based WiFi company, is a known workaholic.
"Occasionally, if I see someone too absorbed reading e-mails, I will
elbow them," she said. And that makes some people wonder if by focusing
on gadgets and gimmicks, everyone's missing the real problem.
"People hate most meetings," Zawodny said. "No one teaches anyone to run them correctly. They become a source of frustration."
That frustration is so widespread that some start-ups cut meetings short or do away with them altogether.
Mountain View, Calif., Internet company Plaxo Inc.
took a "meat ax" to meetings, moving them all to Tuesdays with the goal
of making other days more productive. (They called it "Meataxo.")
San Francisco event planning site Socializr Inc.
has only one meeting a week, during lunch. "That way, even if the
meeting is a complete pointless waste of time, we still ate," said
company founder Jonathan Abrams.
Photo-sharing site SmugMug Inc. in Mountain View is an "anti-meeting" company, founder Don MacAskill said.
"We have a single all-hands meeting once per week, and the emphasis is
on getting it over fast. Only one topic is allowed. Each person is
expected to answer the question 'What am I working on this week?' and
is expressly forbidden to talk about what they did the week before,
make announcements, ask questions, etc."
|
| |
Leave a Comment